SLAM

Resource-constrained autonomous robots rely on sparse direct and semi-direct visual-(inertial)-odometry (VO) pipelines, as they provide a favorable tradeoff between accuracy, robustness, and computational cost. However, the performance of most systems depends critically on hand-tuned hyperparameters governing feature detection, tracking, and outlier rejection. These parameters are typically fixed during deployment, even though their optimal values vary with scene characteristics such as texture density, illumination, motion blur, and sensor noise, leading to brittle performance in real-world environments. We propose the first image-conditioned reinforcement learning framework for online tuning of VO frontend parameters, effectively embedding the expert into the system. Our key idea is to formulate the frontend configuration as a sequential decision-making problem and learn a policy that directly maps visual input to feature detection and tracking parameters. The policy uses a lightweight texture-aware CNN encoder and a privileged critic during training. Unlike prior RL-based approaches that rely solely on internal VO statistics, our method observes the image content and proactively adapts parameters before tracking degrades. Experiments on TartanAirV2 and TUM RGB-D show 3x longer feature tracks and 3x lower computational cost, despite training entirely in simulation.

Accurate localization in autonomous driving is critical for successful missions including environmental mapping and survivor searches. In visually challenging environments, including low-light conditions, overexposure, illumination changes, and high parallax, the performance of conventional visual odometry methods significantly degrade undermining robust robotic navigation. Researchers have recently proposed LiDAR-inertial-visual odometry (LIVO) frameworks, that integrate LiDAR, IMU, and camera sensors, to address these challenges. This paper extends the FAST-LIVO2-based framework by introducing a hybrid approach that integrates direct photometric methods with descriptor-based feature matching. For the descriptor-based feature matching, this work proposes pairs of ORB with the Hamming distance, SuperPoint with SuperGlue, SuperPoint with LightGlue, and XFeat with the mutual nearest neighbor. The proposed configurations are benchmarked by accuracy, computational cost, and feature tracking stability, enabling a quantitative comparison of the adaptability and applicability of visual descriptors. The experimental results reveal that the proposed hybrid approach outperforms the conventional sparse-direct method. Although the sparse-direct method often fails to converge in regions where photometric inconsistency arises due to illumination changes, the proposed approach still maintains robust performance under the same conditions. Furthermore, the hybrid approach with learning-based descriptors enables robust and reliable visual state estimation across challenging environments.

We present a modular, full-stack autonomy system for lunar surface navigation and mapping developed for the Lunar Autonomy Challenge. Operating in a GNSS-denied, visually challenging environment, our pipeline integrates semantic segmentation, stereo visual odometry, pose graph SLAM with loop closures, and layered planning and control. We leverage lightweight learning-based perception models for real-time segmentation and feature tracking and use a factor-graph backend to maintain globally consistent localization. High-level waypoint planning is designed to promote mapping coverage while encouraging frequent loop closures, and local motion planning uses arc sampling with geometric obstacle checks for efficient, reactive control. We evaluate our approach in the competition's high-fidelity lunar simulator, demonstrating centimeter-level localization accuracy, high-fidelity map generation, and strong repeatability across random seeds and rock distributions. Our solution achieved first place in the final competition evaluation.

This work presents a comprehensive benchmark evaluation of visual odometry (VO) and visual SLAM (VSLAM) systems for mobile robot navigation in real-world logistical environments. We compare multiple visual odometry approaches across controlled trajectories covering translational, rotational, and mixed motion patterns, as well as a large-scale production facility dataset spanning approximately 1.7 km. Performance is evaluated using Absolute Pose Error (APE) against ground truth from a Vicon motion capture system and a LiDAR-based SLAM reference. Our results show that a hybrid stack combining the cuVSLAM front-end with a custom SLAM back-end achieves the strongest mapping accuracy, motivating a deeper integration of cuVSLAM as the core VO component in our robotics stack. We further validate this integration by deploying and testing the cuVSLAM-based VO stack on an NVIDIA Jetson platform.

Conventional visual simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) algorithms often fail under rapid motion, low illumination, or abrupt lighting transitions due to motion blur and limited dynamic range. Event cameras mitigate these issues with high temporal resolution and high dynamic range (HDR), but their sparse, asynchronous outputs complicate feature extraction and integration with other sensors; e.g. inertial measurement units (IMUs) and standard cameras. We present Edged USLAM, a hybrid visual-inertial system that extends Ultimate SLAM (USLAM) with an edge-aware front-end and a lightweight depth module. The frontend enhances event frames for robust feature tracking and nonlinear motion compensation, while the depth module provides coarse, region-of-interest (ROI)-based scene depth to improve motion compensation and scale consistency. Evaluations across public benchmarks and real-world unmanned air vehicle (UAV) flights demonstrate that performance varies significantly by scenario. For instance, event-only methods like point-line event-based visual-inertial odometry (PL-EVIO) or learning-based pipelines such as deep event-based visual odometry (DEVO) excel in highly aggressive or extreme HDR conditions. In contrast, Edged USLAM provides superior stability and minimal drift in slow or structured trajectories, ensuring consistently accurate localization on real flights under challenging illumination. These findings highlight the complementary strengths of event-only, learning-based, and hybrid approaches, while positioning Edged USLAM as a robust solution for diverse aerial navigation tasks.

In this work, we introduce the first framework for Motion-aware Event Suppression, which learns to filter events triggered by IMOs and ego-motion in real time. Our model jointly segments IMOs in the current event stream while predicting their future motion, enabling anticipatory suppression of dynamic events before they occur. Our lightweight architecture achieves 173 Hz inference on consumer-grade GPUs with less than 1 GB of memory usage, outperforming previous state-of-the-art methods on the challenging EVIMO benchmark by 67\% in segmentation accuracy while operating at a 53\% higher inference rate. Moreover, we demonstrate significant benefits for downstream applications: our method accelerates Vision Transformer inference by 83\% via token pruning and improves event-based visual odometry accuracy, reducing Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE) by 13\%.

Estimating camera motion from monocular video is a fundamental problem in computer vision, central to tasks such as SLAM, visual odometry, and structure-from-motion. Existing methods that recover the camera's heading under known rotation, whether from an IMU or an optimization algorithm, tend to perform well in low-noise, low-outlier conditions, but often decrease in accuracy or become computationally expensive as noise and outlier levels increase. To address these limitations, we propose a novel generalization of the Hough transform on the unit sphere (S(2)) to estimate the camera's heading. First, the method extracts correspondences between two frames and generates a great circle of directions compatible with each pair of correspondences. Then, by discretizing the unit sphere using a Fibonacci lattice as bin centers, each great circle casts votes for a range of directions, ensuring that features unaffected by noise or dynamic objects vote consistently for the correct motion direction. Experimental results on three datasets demonstrate that the proposed method is on the Pareto frontier of accuracy versus efficiency. Additionally, experiments on SLAM show that the proposed method reduces RMSE by correcting the heading during camera pose initialization.

We introduce OpenVO, a novel framework for Open-world Visual Odometry (VO) with temporal awareness under limited input conditions. OpenVO effectively estimates real-world-scale ego-motion from monocular dashcam footage with varying observation rates and uncalibrated cameras, enabling robust trajectory dataset construction from rare driving events recorded in dashcam. Existing VO methods are trained on fixed observation frequency (e.g., 10Hz or 12Hz), completely overlooking temporal dynamics information. Many prior methods also require calibrated cameras with known intrinsic parameters. Consequently, their performance degrades when (1) deployed under unseen observation frequencies or (2) applied to uncalibrated cameras. These significantly limit their generalizability to many downstream tasks, such as extracting trajectories from dashcam footage. To address these challenges, OpenVO (1) explicitly encodes temporal dynamics information within a two-frame pose regression framework and (2) leverages 3D geometric priors derived from foundation models. We validate our method on three major autonomous-driving benchmarks - KITTI, nuScenes, and Argoverse 2 - achieving more than 20 performance improvement over state-of-the-art approaches. Under varying observation rate settings, our method is significantly more robust, achieving 46%-92% lower errors across all metrics. These results demonstrate the versatility of OpenVO for real-world 3D reconstruction and diverse downstream applications.

Accurate state estimation in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is crucial for ensuring reliable and safe operation, as anomalies occurring during mission execution may induce discrepancies between expected and observed system behaviors, thereby compromising mission success or posing potential safety hazards. It is essential to continuously monitor and detect such conditions in order to ensure a timely response and maintain system reliability. In this work, we focus on UAV state estimation anomalies and provide a large-scale real-world UAV dataset to facilitate research aimed at improving the development of anomaly detection. Unlike existing datasets that primarily rely on injected faults into simulated data, this dataset comprises 1396 real flight logs totaling over 52 hours of flight time, collected across diverse indoor and outdoor environments using a collection of PX4-based UAVs equipped with a variety of sensor configurations. The dataset comprises both normal and anomalous flights without synthetic manipulation, making it uniquely suitable for realistic anomaly detection tasks. A structured classification is proposed that categorizes UAV state estimation anomalies into four classes: mechanical and electrical, external position, global position, and altitude anomalies. These classifications reflect collective, contextual, and outlier anomalies observed in multivariate sensor data streams, including IMU, GPS, barometer, magnetometer, distance sensors, visual odometry, and optical flow, that can be found in the PX4 logging mechanism. It is anticipated that this dataset will play a key role in the development, training, and evaluation of anomaly detection and isolation systems to address the critical gap in UAV reliability research.

We propose GSO-SLAM, a real-time monocular dense SLAM system that leverages Gaussian scene representation. Unlike existing methods that couple tracking and mapping with a unified scene, incurring computational costs, or loosely integrate them with well-structured tracking frameworks, introducing redundancies, our method bidirectionally couples Visual Odometry (VO) and Gaussian Splatting (GS). Specifically, our approach formulates joint optimization within an Expectation-Maximization (EM) framework, enabling the simultaneous refinement of VO-derived semi-dense depth estimates and the GS representation without additional computational overhead. Moreover, we present Gaussian Splat Initialization, which utilizes image information, keyframe poses, and pixel associations from VO to produce close approximations to the final Gaussian scene, thereby eliminating the need for heuristic methods. Through extensive experiments, we validate the effectiveness of our method, showing that it not only operates in real time but also achieves state-of-the-art geometric/photometric fidelity of the reconstructed scene and tracking accuracy.

What is this report: This is a scientific report, contributing with a detailed bibliography, a dataset which we will call now PFSeq for ''Photorealistic Fisheye Sequence'' and make available at https://doi.org/10. 57745/DYIVVU, and comprehensive experiments. This work should be considered as a draft, and has been done during my PhD thesis ''Construction of 3D models from fisheye video data-Application to the localisation in urban area'' in 2014 [Mor16]. These results have never been published. The aim was to find the best features detector and descriptor for fisheye images, in the context of selfcalibration, with cameras mounted on the top of a car and aiming at the zenith (to proceed then fisheye visual odometry and stereovision in urban scenes). We face a chicken and egg problem, because we can not take advantage of an accurate projection model for an optimal features detection and description, and we rightly need good features to perform the calibration (i.e. to compute the accurate projection model of the camera). What is not this report: It does not contribute with new features algorithm. It does not compare standard features algorithms to algorithms designed for omnidirectional images (unfortunately). It has not been peer-reviewed. Discussions have been translated and enhanced but the experiments have not been run again and the report has not been updated accordingly to the evolution of the state-of-the-art (read this as a 2014 report).

The availability of commercial wireless communication and sensing equipment combined with the advancements in intelligent autonomous systems paves the way towards robust joint communications and simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM). This paper surveys the state-of-the-art in the nexus of SLAM and Wireless Communications, attributing the bidirectional impact of each with a focus on visual SLAM (V-SLAM) integration. We provide an overview of key concepts related to wireless signal propagation, geometric channel modeling, and radio frequency (RF)-based localization and sensing. In addition to this, we show image processing techniques that can detect landmarks, proactively predicting optimal paths for wireless channels. Several dimensions are considered, including the prerequisites, techniques, background, and future directions and challenges of the intersection between SLAM and wireless communications. We analyze mathematical approaches such as probabilistic models, and spatial methods for signal processing, as well as key technological aspects. We expose techniques and items towards enabling a highly effective retrieval of the autonomous robot state. Among other interesting findings, we observe that monocular V-SLAM would benefit from RF relevant information, as the latter can serve as a proxy for the scale ambiguity resolution. Conversely, we find that wireless communications in the context of 5G and beyond can potentially benefit from visual odometry that is central in SLAM. Moreover, we examine other sources besides the camera for SLAM and describe the twofold relation with wireless communications. Finally, integrated solutions performing joint communications and SLAM are still in their infancy: theoretical and practical advancements are required to add higher-level localization and semantic perception capabilities to RF and multi-antenna technologies.

The emergence of visual foundation models has revolutionized visual odometry~(VO) and SLAM, enabling pose estimation and dense reconstruction within a single feed-forward network. However, unlike traditional pipelines that leverage keyframe methods to enhance efficiency and accuracy, current foundation model based methods, such as VGGT-Long, typically process raw image sequences indiscriminately. This leads to computational redundancy and degraded performance caused by low inter-frame parallax, which provides limited contextual stereo information. Integrating traditional geometric heuristics into these methods is non-trivial, as their performance depends on high-dimensional latent representations rather than explicit geometric metrics. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel keyframe-based feed-forward VO. Instead of relying on hand-crafted rules, our approach employs reinforcement learning to derive an adaptive keyframe policy in a data-driven manner, aligning selection with the intrinsic characteristics of the underlying foundation model. We train our agent on TartanAir dataset and conduct extensive evaluations across several real-world datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves consistent and substantial improvements over state-of-the-art feed-forward VO methods.

Monocular omnidirectional visual odometry (OVO) systems leverage 360-degree cameras to overcome field-of-view limitations of perspective VO systems. However, existing methods, reliant on handcrafted features or photometric objectives, often lack robustness in challenging scenarios, such as aggressive motion and varying illumination. To address this, we present 360DVO, the first deep learning-based OVO framework. Our approach introduces a distortion-aware spherical feature extractor (DAS-Feat) that adaptively learns distortion-resistant features from 360-degree images. These sparse feature patches are then used to establish constraints for effective pose estimation within a novel omnidirectional differentiable bundle adjustment (ODBA) module. To facilitate evaluation in realistic settings, we also contribute a new real-world OVO benchmark. Extensive experiments on this benchmark and public synthetic datasets (TartanAir V2 and 360VO) demonstrate that 360DVO surpasses state-of-the-art baselines (including 360VO and OpenVSLAM), improving robustness by 50% and accuracy by 37.5%. Homepage: https://chris1004336379.github.io/360DVO-homepage

Accurate and real-time 6-DoF localization is mission-critical for autonomous lunar landing, yet existing approaches remain limited: visual odometry (VO) drifts unboundedly, while map-based absolute localization fails in texture-sparse or low-light terrain. We introduce KANLoc, a monocular localization framework that tightly couples VO with a lightweight but robust absolute pose regressor. At its core is a Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN) that learns the complex mapping from image features to map coordinates, producing sparse but highly reliable global pose anchors. These anchors are fused into a bundle adjustment framework, effectively canceling drift while retaining local motion precision. KANLoc delivers three key advances: (i) a KAN-based pose regressor that achieves high accuracy with remarkable parameter efficiency, (ii) a hybrid VO-absolute localization scheme that yields globally consistent real-time trajectories (>=15 FPS), and (iii) a tailored data augmentation strategy that improves robustness to sensor occlusion. On both realistic synthetic and real lunar landing datasets, KANLoc reduces average translation and rotation error by 32% and 45%, respectively, with per-trajectory gains of up to 45%/48%, outperforming strong baselines.

This work presents two novel solvers for estimating the relative poses among views with known vertical directions. The vertical directions of camera views can be easily obtained using inertial measurement units (IMUs) which have been widely used in autonomous vehicles, mobile phones, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Given the known vertical directions, our lgorithms only need to solve for two rotation angles and two translation vectors. In this paper, a linear closed-form solution has been described, requiring only four point correspondences in three views. We also propose a minimal solution with three point correspondences using the latest Gröbner basis solver. Since the proposed methods require fewer point correspondences, they can be efficiently applied within the RANSAC framework for outliers removal and pose estimation in visual odometry. The proposed method has been tested on both synthetic data and real-world scenes from KITTI. The experimental results show that the accuracy of the estimated poses is superior to other alternative methods.

While many visual odometry (VO), visual-inertial odometry (VIO), and SLAM systems achieve high accuracy, the majority of existing methods miss to assess risks at runtime. This paper presents SUPER (Sensitivity-based Uncertainty-aware PErformance and Risk assessment) that is a generic and explainable framework that propagates uncertainties via sensitivities for real-time risk assessment in VIO. The scientific novelty lies in the derivation of a real-time risk indicator that is backend-agnostic and exploits the Schur complement blocks of the Gauss-Newton normal matrix to propagate uncertainties. Practically, the Schur complement captures the sensitivity that reflects the influence of the uncertainty on the risk occurrence. Our framework estimates risks on the basis of the residual magnitudes, geometric conditioning, and short horizon temporal trends without requiring ground truth knowledge. Our framework enables to reliably predict trajectory degradation 50 frames ahead with an improvement of 20% to the baseline. In addition, SUPER initiates a stop or relocalization policy with 89.1% recall. The framework is backend agnostic and operates in real time with less than 0.2% additional CPU cost. Experiments show that SUPER provides consistent uncertainty estimates. A SLAM evaluation highlights the applicability to long horizon mapping.

Spatially inhomogeneous magnetic fields offer a valuable, non-visual information source for positioning. Among systems leveraging this, magnetic field-based simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) systems are particularly attractive because they can provide positioning information and build a magnetic field map on the fly. Moreover, they have bounded error within mapped regions. However, state-of-the-art methods typically require low-drift odometry data provided by visual odometry or a wheel encoder, etc. This is because these systems need to minimize/reduce positioning errors while exploring, which happens when they are in unmapped regions. To address these limitations, this work proposes a loosely coupled and a tightly coupled inertial magnetic SLAM (IM-SLAM) system. The proposed systems use commonly available low-cost sensors: an inertial measurement unit (IMU), a magnetometer array, and a barometer. The use of non-visual data provides a significant advantage over visual-based systems, making it robust to low-visibility conditions. Both systems employ state-space representations, and magnetic field models on different scales. The difference lies in how they use a local and global magnetic field model. The loosely coupled system uses these models separately in two state-space models, while the tightly coupled system integrates them into one state-space model. Experiment results show that the tightly coupled IM-SLAM system achieves lower positioning errors than the loosely coupled system in most scenarios, with typical errors on the order of meters per 100 meters traveled. These results demonstrate the feasiblity of developing a full 3D IM-SLAM systems using low-cost sensors and the potential of applying these systems in emergency response scenarios such as mine/fire rescue.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Visual odometry techniques typically rely on feature extraction from a sequence of images and subsequent computation of optical flow. This point-to-point correspondence between two consecutive frames can be costly to compute and suffers from varying accuracy, which affects the odometry estimate's quality. Attempts have been made to bypass the difficulties originating from the correspondence problem by adopting line features and fusing other sensors (event camera, IMU) to improve performance, many of which still heavily rely on correspondence. If the camera observes a straight line as it moves, the image of the line sweeps a smooth surface in image-space time. It is a ruled surface and analyzing its shape gives information about odometry. Further, its estimation requires only differentially computed updates from point-to-line associations. Inspired by event cameras' propensity for edge detection, this research presents a novel algorithm to reconstruct 3D scenes and visual odometry from these ruled surfaces. By constraining the surfaces with the inertia measurements from an onboard IMU sensor, the dimensionality of the solution space is greatly reduced.

Underwater visual localization remains challenging due to wavelength-dependent attenuation, poor texture, and non-Gaussian sensor noise. We introduce MARVO, a physics-aware, learning-integrated odometry framework that fuses underwater image formation modeling, differentiable matching, and reinforcement-learning optimization. At the front-end, we extend transformer-based feature matcher with a Physics Aware Radiance Adapter that compensates for color channel attenuation and contrast loss, yielding geometrically consistent feature correspondences under turbidity. These semi dense matches are combined with inertial and pressure measurements inside a factor-graph backend, where we formulate a keyframe-based visual-inertial-barometric estimator using GTSAM library. Each keyframe introduces (i) Pre-integrated IMU motion factors, (ii) MARVO-derived visual pose factors, and (iii) barometric depth priors, giving a full-state MAP estimate in real time. Lastly, we introduce a Reinforcement-Learningbased Pose-Graph Optimizer that refines global trajectories beyond local minima of classical least-squares solvers by learning optimal retraction actions on SE(2).

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Accurate state estimation for flexible robotic systems poses significant challenges, particular for platforms with dynamically deforming structures that invalidate rigid-body assumptions. This paper tackles this problem and allows to extend existing rigid-body pose estimation methods to non-rigid systems. Our approach hinges on two core assumptions: first, the elastic properties are captured by an injective deformation-force model, efficiently learned via a Multi-Layer Perceptron; second, we solve the platform's inherently smooth motion using continuous-time B-spline kinematic models. By continuously applying Newton's Second Law, our method establishes a physical link between visually-derived trajectory acceleration and predicted deformation-induced acceleration. We demonstrate that our approach not only enables robust and accurate pose estimation on non-rigid platforms, but that the properly modeled platform physics instigate inertial sensing properties. We demonstrate this feasibility on a simple spring-camera system, and show how it robustly resolves the typically ill-posed problem of metric scale and gravity recovery in monocular visual odometry.

We present AMB3R, a multi-view feed-forward model for dense 3D reconstruction on a metric-scale that addresses diverse 3D vision tasks. The key idea is to leverage a sparse, yet compact, volumetric scene representation as our backend, enabling geometric reasoning with spatial compactness. Although trained solely for multi-view reconstruction, we demonstrate that AMB3R can be seamlessly extended to uncalibrated visual odometry (online) or large-scale structure from motion without the need for task-specific fine-tuning or test-time optimization. Compared to prior pointmap-based models, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in camera pose, depth, and metric-scale estimation, 3D reconstruction, and even surpasses optimization-based SLAM and SfM methods with dense reconstruction priors on common benchmarks.

Accurate proprioceptive odometry is fundamental for legged robot navigation in GPS-denied and visually degraded environments where conventional visual odometry systems fail. Current approaches face critical limitations: analytical filtering methods suffer from modeling uncertainties and cumulative drift, hybrid learning-filtering approaches remain constrained by their analytical components, while pure learning-based methods struggle with simulation-to-reality transfer and demand extensive real-world data collection. This paper introduces AutoOdom, a novel autoregressive proprioceptive odometry system that overcomes these challenges through an innovative two-stage training paradigm. Stage 1 employs large-scale simulation data to learn complex nonlinear dynamics and rapidly changing contact states inherent in legged locomotion, while Stage 2 introduces an autoregressive enhancement mechanism using limited real-world data to effectively bridge the sim-to-real gap. The key innovation lies in our autoregressive training approach, where the model learns from its own predictions to develop resilience against sensor noise and improve robustness in highly dynamic environments. Comprehensive experimental validation on the Booster T1 humanoid robot demonstrates that AutoOdom significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods across all evaluation metrics, achieving 57.2% improvement in absolute trajectory error, 59.2% improvement in Umeyama-aligned error, and 36.2% improvement in relative pose error compared to the Legolas baseline. Extensive ablation studies provide critical insights into sensor modality selection and temporal modeling, revealing counterintuitive findings about IMU acceleration data and validating our systematic design choices for robust proprioceptive odometry in challenging locomotion scenarios.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Deep learning-based Visual SLAM (vSLAM) systems exhibit exceptional geometric reasoning capabilities, yet their prohibitive computational overhead severely restricts deployment on resource-constrained autonomous platforms. This paper presents a hierarchical quantization optimization framework, DPVO-QAT++ (DPVO-QAT++: Heterogeneous QAT and CUDA Kernel Fusion for High-Performance Deep Patch Visual Odometry). Through the synergistic integration of learnable scale parameterization, a heterogeneous precision design for the Visual Odometry (VO) front-end and back-end (front-end floating-point fake quantization with FP16/FP32; back-end full precision), and GPU-native kernel fusion for fake quantization (custom CUDA kernels), our framework significantly reduces memory footprint and increases processing speed while preserving the trajectory accuracy of the original model. On the TartanAir dataset, our framework achieves an average FPS increase of 52.1%, a 29.1% reduction in median latency, and a 64.9% reduction in peak GPU memory reservation, while maintaining trajectory accuracy (ATE) comparable to the original DPVO model across 32 validation sequences. On the EuRoC dataset, it realizes an average FPS increase of 30.1%, a 23.1% reduction in median latency, and a 37.7% reduction in peak GPU memory reservation, maintaining comparable trajectory accuracy (ATE) across 11 validation sequences. Experimental results demonstrate that DPVO-QAT++ effectively bridges the gap between high-precision deep VO and the efficiency requirements for practical deployment, offering a viable engineering paradigm for the application of this technology on real-world embedded platforms. Keywords: Visual Odometry, Heterogeneous Precision Architecture, Quantization-Aware Training, CUDA Kernel Fusion, Scale-Only Training, Deep Patch Visual Odometry, GPU-Native Kernel Fusion.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.

Abstract unavailable in cached data. It will appear after the next refresh.